Conspiracy theorists are having a field day with a batch of recently released emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s official administration accounts.
If you’ve been on social media whatsoever over the past couple of days, you may have noticed #FauciEmails trending. Or you might have seen your own family and friends sharing screenshots of those mails along with commentary about the large reveals and discoveries uncovered from the email release.
But here is the truth: There are no large displays. There are no bombshells.
Let’s break down the misinformation that’s being spread around so that you can stay away from it.
For starters, the emails are actual. They are from Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. They were not hacked, either. (We’re so used to hearing about email archives obtained by hackers and dumped online that it’s a simple assumption to make.) The emails were obtained legitimately by websites out like The Washington Post and BuzzFeed using Freedom of Information Act requests.
There are thousands of pages of work emails from Dr. Fauci, the man who became several Americans’ go-to source of COVID-19 information.
Conspiracy theorists, along with some on the far right, claim that the emails are filled with hidden truths about COVID-19 that are finally coming to light. This is not the case.
For example, conspiracy theorists claim the emails prove that the COVID-19 virus was created in a lab in Wuhan, China, and also that Dr. Fauci was lying about masks. Those two points seem to be the main focus of the conspiratorial talk surrounding the newly released emails.
The lab leak theory
The first point, that COVID-19 escaped from a Chinese lab, had already gained momentum as a theory in recent months. The idea this could have happened was, in fact, spoken about in some of the emails that were sent early on in the pandemic. However, as more experts weighed in as they continued to learn more about the virus, the lab origin theory became less and less likely.
Fast forward to June 2020. A viral post on Medium by Nicholas Wade, a fairly controversial New York Times science reporter, gave new life to the lab leak theory. However, there still isn’t any new evidence that points to it being true. Now the ongoing scientific uncertainty about the origins of COVID-19 have combined with the recent Fauci email dump to give anyone looking to prove the theory plenty of ammunition.
What the conspiratorial thinkers going through Fauci’s emails don’t seem to realize (or at least won’t acknowledge) is that many of these documents are not authored by Fauci himself. The email release includes messages that were sent to him as well.
It’s with those emails, the ones that were written by others and sent to Fauci, that the lab leak theory is mentioned and where the misinformation originates.
Take this March 2020 email with the subject”Coronavirus bioweapon manufacturing procedure.”
“This is how the virus was created,” reads the start of the email, followed by another paragraph full of medical jargon that looks like it could be the recipe for creating a virus.
That would be eye-opening if that was written by Dr. Fauci. It wasn’t. It was authored by an individual named Adam Gaertner and forwarded to Fauci by a redacted sender.
Gaertner is a self-described”independent virology researcher” He runs a COVID-19 website, called “COVID Candy,” that peddles conspiracy theories. It also sells conspiracy-themed COVID-19 merch, such as t-shirts and baseball caps.
As for the supposed COVID-19 recipe included in his email that was sent to Fauci? It was a paragraph from a scientific coronavirus study in 2005 that was copied and pasted. It has nothing to do with COVID-19.
Another email being used to push the lab leak theory is one from immunologist Kristian G. Andersen. In the February 2020 email to Fauci, Andersen theorized that the virus looks”odd” and has features that could possibly indicate it was engineered.
“Our investigations clearly demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a intentionally manipulated virus,” Andersen’s study concluded.
The mask debate
The second topic that’s being portrayed as an earth-shattering reveal from conspiracy theories is Fauci’s early opinion on the effectiveness of masks.
“Masks are really for infected individuals to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected instead of protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection,” reads an email in early February writ